Indian Succession Act, 1925–Sec. 63–Will–Establishment–Document reveals that the testator besides bequeathing the suit property and other goods to the plaintiff had provided for certain other obligations–Attesting witness J admitted his signatures–Minor contradictions in the evidence have no consequence as the Will was executed in the year 1976 and statements were recorded after 23 years–Not a word was put to any of the witnesses pertaining to the valid disposing state of the mind of testator–Nothing was placed on record to contradict the signature of the testator–Plea of non-disclosure of Will has also no substance–Nothing was brought on record to substantiate the so-called suspicious circumstances–Nothing to show that the testator had bequeathed the property to ‘SU’–Suit was filed within limitation–Plea of advance possession is also found groundless–Held, suit was rightly decreed.
