Limitation Act, 1963–Art. 15(2)–Suit for damage–Limitation for filing–Successive breaches of contract–Respondent kept the contact alive despite that–Conclusion of High Court that the last date of breach and last date of payment is relevant and not each cause of action, is patently erroneous–It was essential for the respondent to have initiate legal action, contemporaneous with the extension granted–Notice u/s. 80 CPC was also given after the suit had become time-barred–Held, suit was barred by limitation.
