Partition–Hindu Law–Sister claimed 1/6 share in the property of father–Trial Court decreed the suit by holding the plaintiff entitled for 1/8 share–Appeal against–View of High Court that plaintiff never challenged the order of Tribunal whereby the tenancy rights were given to defendant no. 4–The
order became final and plaintiff-sister had no right in the claimed property–Further view of High Court that the plaintiff has failed to establish that the suit property was an absolute property of her father–Whether unjustified ?–Held, no–Further held, it would not be proper to take a view that the land in question was not an agricultural land when the rights were recognized by Tribunal–Interference declined in the findings of High Court.
