Permanent Injunction–Suit for–Decreed–Case of plaintiffs that they have the easementary rights towards the western lane and they have the windows/ventilations of their house–Concurrent findings that the windows/ventilatons are existed for last 50 years–Contention regarding non-framing of issue as regards to easementary rights does not merit acceptance because it is implicit in the issue no. 1–Further, it was the specific case of plaintiffs–Concurrent findings–Interference declined.
