Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 302, 364A & 120B–Conviction–Sustainable against whom ?–Case of circumstantial evidence–Appellant V was in the control of the room from where the dead body of the child was recovered–He put the lock on the room–He tried to give an evasive reply when PW 14 asked him for opening the room–Burden to explain the circumstance was on him–Held, he was rightly convicted–However, there is no word in the FIR that the ransom was demanded by three accused persons–Prosecution evidence against the accused L is not of such cinching worth and does not lead to an irrefutable inference that he was also involved in the kidnapping and murder of the child–He is entitled to be acquitted.
