Penal Code, 1860–Sec. 302–Conviction–Justification–Circumstantial evidence–Neither the accused nor the articles used in crime could be identified–Mere identification of one figure of the registration number of motorcycle is not a scanty evidence holding the recovery of motor-cycle–Witness of recovery of articles admitted that he signed the recovery panchanama in a police station–Another witness was not present–Knife recovered was not produced before the Court–No reference that the tyre marks were lifted and they were kept in sealed condition till sending to FSL–Prosecution also failed to establish the motive Held, the conviction cannot be sustained.