Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988–Secs. 7 & 13(1)(d), 13(2)–Charge for the offence–Quashed by High Court–Justification–Trape–Recovery of tainted money–Allegation against the respondent doctor for demanding the illegal gratification for better treatment and operation–High Court relied on the affidavit of witness containing that there was no demand of money–Contents of FIR and evidence collected by investigation agency are of such nature that the complaint cannot be quashed–Such practice depreciated and impugned judgment set aside.
