Possession–Suit for–Decreed by first appellate Court–View of High Court that the adverse possession of defendants over the property was matured, therefore, the suit was barred by limitation–Claim of plaintiff that he purchased the property from the Managing Officer, Rehabilitation Department and certificate of sale was issued to him on 4th January, 1965–Factum of vesting the rights of suit property with the Managing Officer and transfer of them in favour of plaintiff was not admitted by the defendants–They denied the title of Managing Officer as well as the plaintiff–No plea of defendants
that the possession was hostile to the true owner of property–Held, findings of High Court as regard to defendants have perfected their title by adverse possession are not legally sustainable.
