Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001–Sec. 9–Eviction–Issue as to whether the notice was served or not ?–PW 1 stated that the notice was served through the regd. post–He produced the postal receipt and receipt receiving the same–It bears the signatures of petitioner’s uncle–It cannot be said that the signatures on the notice were forged–Specific findings of Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal that the petitioner failed to show that the said notice was not received by him–Despite the service of notice, due rent was not paid within one month–Held, eviction was justified.
