Specific Relief Act, 1963–Sec. 6–Decree of suit–Sustainability–When the plaintiff was in possession of the complete premises being the owner of the premises in question by virtue of Will executed in his favour, how the area marked in yellow was in possession of the defendants, is not comprehensible–It is also not clear that why the defendants would take possession of the complete groundfloor and leave one room for the plaintiff–There was nothing available on the record firstly to effect that the plaintiff was in possession of the complete premises and secondly, he was evicted on 28.07.2004 by the defendants–Impugned judgment and decree are liable to be quashed and set aside.
