Code of Civil Procedure, 1908–Order 39, Rules 1 & 2–Application for temporary injunction–Dismissed–Appreciation of–Land in question was in municipal area and it was vested in UIT–Petitioner is subsequent purchaser and he cannot have better title than the predecessor–When the right of predecessor is in doubt and the pattas do not relate to receipts and if even relates to
each other, it is the matter of evidence–Court cannot held enquiry u/Art. 227 into the validity of documents–Held, temporary injunction was rightly declined.
