Permanent & Mandatory Injunction–Suit for–Decreed–Plaintiff established the existence of three feet wide gali between the houses of parties–Defendants neither challenged the genuineness nor denied the existence of the document Ex. 4–Further, it is not the case of defendants that the gali was in their exclusive possession–They admitted the fact of raising construction over the disputed land–Held, no error was committed by trial Court in issuing the direction to them for removal of construction.
