Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988–Secs. 7 & 13(1)(d) r/w. 13(2)–Conviction–Sustainable against whom–Though A-2 was caught red handed but it is no ones case that he ever demanded any illegal gratification–No evidence was produced which could establish that he was a habitual offender working in aid with A1 or facilitating A1 in demanding and receiving illegal gratification–In absence of charge of abetment and the proof of connivance between A-1 and A2, he could not have been convicted.
