Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955–Secs. 88 & 188–Hindu Succession Act, 1956–Remand of the case by BOR–Appreciation of–BOR observed that the issue with respect to the property being ancestral in nature has not been really decided and inference is sought to be made on the ground that the respondent no. 2 has acted as the karta of family, which suggests that the land in question was ancestral in nature–BOR rightly remanded back the matter–Further, the validity of sale of land made by the respondent no. 2 can be challenged by initiating the appropriate proceedings before the Civil Court and the Revenue Court has no jurisdiction to decide the issue–Held, no case is made out for interference.
