Permanent Injunction–Suit for–Partly decreed by the Appellate Court–Plaintiff and his witnesses were not cross-examined over the issue of possession–Further, the defendants failed to establish that the subject land was the part of Khasra no. 226 min for which the decree of permanent injunction has been passed by the revenue Court–Further, it was also established that the plaintiff is in peaceful possession–Therefore, the suit for permanent injunction simpliciter was maintainable–Interference declined.
