Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B & 201–Criminal proceedings–Petitioner is a property dealer–Allegation up to effect that after receiving a sum of Rs. forty lacs, petitioner destroyed the agreement of sale–He has not come out with the case as to how he became the owner of the plot and how the regd. sale deed was executed in his own name–It cannot be said that the proceedings are counterblast of the proceedings initiated by him u/s. 138 of N.I. Act–Interference declined.
