Partition & Permanent Injunction–Suit for–Dismissal of–Plaintiff admitted in exhibit 10 that partition of the ancestral property had already been effected–Explanation furnished by him as to the execution of this document for the purpose of avoiding income tax liability was rightly rejected by trial Court as the exhibit nos. 55 to 59 were not proved by him–Trial Court rightly concluded that the property was not the outcome of the profits of the firm–Concurrent findings–Interference declined.
